🔗 Share this article

Decreases to learning offerings within prisons are hindering inmates' employment and training options, in the long run posing a risk to public safety, per a latest report from a prison watchdog organization.

Cycle of Reoffending Linked to Lack of Education

Repeat criminals often create mayhem in their neighborhoods due to the inability of correctional facilities to supply adequate education and employment opportunities that could help disrupt the pattern of reoffending, the report stated.

“I have serious concerns about the effect of inflation-adjusted learning funding reductions on currently inadequate provision and about the absence of genuine desire and ambition for improvement that this represents.”

Budget Reductions Endanger Rehabilitation Efforts

Despite commitments to improve access to learning, spending on direct learning services in prisons is being cut by as much as 50%, per recent reports.

While the total training allocation has remained unchanged, the cost of course agreements has increased significantly, according to prison administrators.

• Only 31% of former prisoners are working half a year after release
• Ninety-four of one hundred four closed prisons were rated “poor” or “below standard” for meaningful activity
• Average attendance in training activities was just 67% in inspected prisons

Inadequate Situations Impede Rehabilitation

Overcrowding, a lack of training facilities, equipment failures, and ageing facilities have compounded the problem, per the analysis.

Numerous prisoners wait for weeks to be assigned an activity space and are often assigned whatever is available, rather than training relevant to their employment prospects upon release.

Although activities went ahead, full-time positions generally engaged prisoners for just five hours per day, with many roles divided into partial places to stretch limited provision further.

Government Response and Future Plans

Correctional system has a duty to safeguard the community by making prisoners less likely to commit crimes again when they are released, but frequently it is falling short to fulfill this responsibility.

Top administrators know that prisons, and ultimately our society, are more secure if prisoners are meaningfully occupied, and that education, training and employment play a vital role in motivating prisoners to change their behavior.

“We know that purposeful engagement can help to facilitate safe and decent correctional facilities and have a positive effect on recidivism levels.”

Unless officials in the correctional service take the delivery of effective training and training more seriously, it is difficult to see how appallingly high recidivism rates can be lowered.

Funding cuts are also likely to hinder efforts to introduce a new incentive-based correctional regime that would allow prisoners to earn time off their incarceration by finishing work, skill development and learning programs.