🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting amendments to a pending law that include lowering the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” stated Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “following international guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for various offences “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.